Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    What sort of objects scientists use as models has importa... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The question of what ontological kinds scientists use as models cannot be dismissed as 'just sociology'

    What sort of objects scientists use as models has important repercussions for how models perform relevant functions such as representation and explanation

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The question of what ontological kinds scientists use as models cannot be dismis...

    Similar

    Many models in science are both logical and representational models si...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    82%
    False models serve a legitimate epistemic function in science80%
    There are no model objects; models only live in scientists' imaginatio...80%
    Agent-based modeling is a more appropriate method for representing how...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: models-science
    View source passageHide passage
    What are models? That is, what kind of object are scientists dealing with when they work with a model? A number of authors have voiced skepticism that this question has a meaningful answer, because models do not belong to a distinctive ontological category and anything can be a model (Callender and Cohen 2006; Giere 2010; Suárez 2004; Swoyer 1991; Teller 2001). Contessa (2010) replies that this is a non sequitur. Even if, from an ontological point of view, anything can be a model and the class o

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective