Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    What we impose upon experience is not derivable from the ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→We cannot regard the forms we represent objects as having (spatiality, temporality, causality, etc.) as the real forms of objects independent of ourselves.

    What we impose upon experience is not derivable from the objects as they are independently of our representations.

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    We can only know a priori what we ourselves impose upon experience.We cannot regard the forms we represent objects as having (spatiality, temporali...We know these forms (spatiality, temporality, causality) a priori.

    Similar

    Whatever we impose upon experience rather than derive from things in t...88%Perceptual experiences are not intersubjectively accessible in the sam...79%External objects inherently transcend any finite set of experiences; n...79%Bodily sensations do not have an intentional object in the way percept...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    The sources as well as the form of Kant’s position are complex. Kant was deeply impressed by what he knew of Leibniz (many of the texts that are crucial to later understandings of Leibniz, such as “Primary Truths”, having been unknown in Kant’s times, or others, such as the New Essays on Human Understanding, having been published only when he was well into his career) and the view that space and time are phaenomena bene fundata as well as by what he knew of Hume and his view that causation is a

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective