Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    When 'bike' is emphasized, the relevant contrast is an ev... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Susan's stealing the bike (rather than stealing the canoe) did not cause her arrest

    When 'bike' is emphasized, the relevant contrast is an event in which Susan steals something else, such as a canoe

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Related

    Susan's stealing the bike (rather than stealing the canoe) did not cause her arr...The contrast between stealing the bike versus stealing the canoe is not what cau...

    Similar

    When 'stealing' is emphasized, the relevant contrast is an event in wh...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    89%
    The contrast between stealing the bike versus stealing the canoe is no...83%
    It is necessarily the case that Susan steals the bike if and only if S...79%
    Susan's stealing the bike (rather than stealing the canoe) did not cau...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: causation-metaphysics
    View source passageHide passage
    If we think that the causal relation is ternary or quaternary, then some of the arguments we considered earlier can look weaker. For instance, consider what we called the causal differences argument from §1.1.4. We argued that we must distinguish the cause “Susan’s stealing the bike” from “Susan’s stealing the bike”, since the latter, but not the former, caused her to be arrested. If we are contrastivists about causation, then we could insist that the differences in focal stress serve to make

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective