Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    When comprehension fails despite repeated efforts, invest... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Enrolling a research candidate in a trial remains legitimate even when the candidate fails to comprehend disclosed information despite repeated efforts.

    When comprehension fails despite repeated efforts, investigators have epistemic evidence that the candidate lacks decision-making capacity, triggering surrogate consent obligations rather than enrollment authorization.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Candidate(as used in medical ethics)
    A person being considered for something, in this case someone being evaluated for their ability to make decisions.
    Decision-making capacity(referring to people (like young children) who cannot legally or mentally make their own decisions)
    The mental and legal ability to understand information and make choices about your own care or life.
    Enrollment authorization(as used in medical ethics and research)
    Official permission from a person to include them in a research study or medical program.
    Epistemic
    "Epistemic" relates to knowledge—how we know things, what counts as knowledge, and whether we can trust what we believe to be true. It comes from the Greek word for knowledge and is used to describe questions about the reliability and validity of our beliefs and understanding. For example, "epistemic humility" means acknowledging the limits of what you can actually know for certain.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Evidence(Distinguished from prior/intrinsic probability in the context of the low priors argument)
    Factors extrinsic to a hypothesis that raise or lower its probability
    Surrogate consent(as used in medical ethics)
    Permission given by someone else (like a family member or guardian) on behalf of a person who cannot make decisions for themselves.
    comprehension(Lewis's modes of meaning; distinguished from denotation)
    The class of possible or consistently thinkable things to which a term applies

    Connections

    2 topics

    Bioethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Enrolling a research candidate in a trial remains legitimate even when the candi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective