When epistemic reduction fixes truth conditions for bridge laws, it thereby determines the identity or constitution relations among the very entities ostensibly governed by ontological reduction.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Bridge laws(Philosophy of mind, type-identity theory): Strict biconditional laws of the form 'P1 ↔ M1' that correlate physical predicates with mental predicates, forming the basis of type-identity theories of mind.
Identity(Adams treats identity statements as a variety of atomic formula rather than a logical truth exempt from existence presuppositions): A relation between an object and itself, expressed as an atomic formula (a=a), subject to the same existence-entailment conditions as other atomic predicates under GSA
Ostensibly(describing needs that appear universal but may not be): Seemingly or appearing to be something on the surface, even if that appearance might be misleading or incomplete.
Truth conditions(used to describe how we determine whether a thought accurately represents reality): The specific circumstances or facts that would make a statement true or false—what has to be the case for a thought to be correct.

Based on where you are in your exploration