Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Whether egalitarianism or prioritarianism is correct dete... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The decomposability of inequality indices and separability of social welfare functions carry significant ethical weight, not merely technical convenience.

    Whether egalitarianism or prioritarianism is correct determines whether such independence assumptions are ethically acceptable.

    ConsequentialismJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Adopting separability implicitly takes a side in the egalitarianism-versus-prior...Separability conditions presuppose that individuals' well-beings can be evaluate...The decomposability of inequality indices and separability of social welfare fun...

    Similar

    Adopting separability implicitly takes a side in the egalitarianism-ve...81%A just egalitarian ideal must reflect limited social responsibility ra...79%Radical egalitarianism of this kind is not required by morality genera...79%Luck egalitarianism is mistaken in its aim because egalitarian justice...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: economic-justice
    View source passageHide passage
    Philosophical interest in the measurement of inequality has recently risen (Temkin 1993). Most of this philosophical literature, however, tends to focus on defining the right foundations for an aversion to inequality. In particular, Parfit (1995) proposes to give priority to the worse-off not because of their relative position compared to the better-off, but because and to the extent that they are badly off. This probably corresponds to defining social welfare by an additively separable social w

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective