Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Whether P equals NP remains unresolved, leaving open whet... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Non-determinism is computationally less powerful with respect to space than it appears to be with respect to time

    Whether P equals NP remains unresolved, leaving open whether non-determinism adds power for time-bounded computation

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    All sources support it1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Non-determinism is computationally less powerful with respect to space than it a...PSPACE equals NPSPACE, meaning non-determinism yields no additional power for sp...

    Similar

    Whether P equals NP remains an open question (non-determinism may add ...90%Whether P equals NP remains open, meaning nondeterminism may provide a...90%PSPACE equals NPSPACE, meaning non-determinism yields no additional po...88%PSPACE equals NPSPACE, meaning nondeterminism provides no asymptotic a...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    As \(\phi \in \sc{SAT}\) just in case a satisfying valuation exists, this is a correct method for deciding \(\sc{SAT}\) relative to conventions (i)–(iii) from above. This means that \(\sc{SAT}\) can be solved in polynomial time relative to \(\mathfrak{N}\). This example also illustrates why adding non-determinism to the original deterministic model \(\mathfrak{T}\) does not enlarge the class of decidable problems. [12] It is evident that if \(N\) has time complexity \(f(n)\), then \(T_N\) must

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective