William Hasker's 'no-freeze' objection establishes that for knowledge of free future actions, the knowing relation must be grounded in the action itself, not in any prior epistemic state of the knower.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
epistemic state(used interchangeably with 'cognitive state' in the passage)
A cognitive state; the way things are represented or appear from the standpoint of a knowing subject
grounded in(whether distinctness or identity is explained by intrinsic features)
To be explained by or to have its reason or basis in something else—like how a tree being wet is grounded in (explained by) recent rain.
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.