Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Williamson's necessitism, which Linsky-Zalta resembles, f... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Linsky-Zalta view that concreteness is a contingent property should be rejected.

    Williamson's necessitism, which Linsky-Zalta resembles, faces the decisive objection that it cannot explain why some necessitist entities have modal profiles radically unlike any concrete thing.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Concrete thing(contrasted with abstract entities in the statement)
    Something physical that you can touch, see, or locate in space and time—like a chair, a person, or a planet.
    Decisive objection(suggesting the problem is fatal to the theory)
    A criticism so strong that it shows a theory cannot possibly be correct, or at least cannot be true in its current form.
    Linsky-Zalta(alternative philosophers with a related view)
    Bernard Linsky and Edward Zalta are philosophers who developed a similar theory to Williamson's, using abstract objects (like numbers and ideas) as examples of things that exist but aren't physical.
    Modal profiles(as used in metaphysics)
    The different ways something could possibly exist or behave—basically, the set of what's possible or necessary about a thing.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Objection (in philosophy)(as used in philosophical argumentation)
    A challenge or counterargument that tries to show a theory or claim is wrong or has a flaw.
    Williamson
    # Williamson Williamson most commonly refers to Timothy Williamson, a prominent British philosopher known for his work on knowledge, logic, and language. He's influential in contemporary philosophy for arguing that knowledge is more fundamental than belief and that traditional definitions of knowledge may be too restrictive. His ideas have shaped how philosophers think about what it means to know something and how language relates to reality.
    necessitism(Philosophy of modality; a logical truth of SQML)
    The view that everything that exists exists necessarily — both possibilia and actually existing things alike are necessary beings, such that there are no worlds from which they are altogether absent.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    The Linsky-Zalta view that concreteness is a contingent property should be rejec...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective