Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without a kind-relative reason to privilege original temp... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The claim that A and A' differ because A' comes into existence after A is not well supported

    Without a kind-relative reason to privilege original temporal position, the claim that A and A' differ merely because A' comes later is unsupported by the sortal itself.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Sortals define identity conditions based on intrinsic properties and kinds, not temporal location or historical accident.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If temporal priority alone grounded difference, numerically distinct objects of the same kind would require independent metaphysical justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The sortal itself supplies only kind-specific criteria; temporal precedence is extrinsic to what makes something that kind of thing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Spatiotemporal location is a fundamental individuation principle that sortals presuppose, not something they must independently justify.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Two qualitatively identical objects at different times are genuinely distinct objects; this distinction is grounded in their spatiotemporal coordinates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The sortal's silence on temporal priority doesn't undermine temporal difference—sortals specify essential properties, not exhaustive identity conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    If temporal priority alone grounded difference, numerically distinct objects of ...Sortals define identity conditions based on intrinsic properties and kinds, not ...Spatiotemporal location is a fundamental individuation principle that sortals pr...The claim that A and A' differ because A' comes into existence after A is not we...
    +3 moreShow less
    The sortal itself supplies only kind-specific criteria; temporal precedence is e...The sortal's silence on temporal priority doesn't undermine temporal difference—...Two qualitatively identical objects at different times are genuinely distinct ob...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit