Without a non-question-begging criterion for 'progress' in cosmic evolution, the claim that the universe evolves progressively is empirically unsupported and teleologically assumed.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(as used in philosophy of science and metaphysics)
Assuming that the universe or history is moving toward some predetermined goal or purpose, without having real evidence for it. It's treating change as if it's heading somewhere 'meant to be.'
teleology(Aristotle's natural philosophy)
Explanation of natural phenomena in terms of purposes or ends — things occurring for the sake of something