Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wittgenstein's private language argument establishes that... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A secret as such does not exist; every secret is necessarily shared.

    Wittgenstein's private language argument establishes that internal representations require public criteria, but this does not collapse the distinction between what is shareable in principle and what is actually shared.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Actually shared(as distinguished from what could be shared in theory)
    Something that has been genuinely communicated and understood by other people in real life.
    Internal representations(what Wittgenstein argues require public criteria)
    Mental images, thoughts, or ideas that exist only in your mind, like picturing your favorite food or remembering a song.
    Public criteria(what internal thoughts need in order to have meaning)
    Shared, observable rules or standards that a group of people can all understand and check—like how we all agree what the color 'red' means.
    Shareable in principle(as distinguished from what is actually shared)
    Something that *could* theoretically be communicated or understood by others, even if you haven't actually told anyone about it yet.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Wittgenstein
    Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who fundamentally changed how people think about language and meaning in the 20th century. He argued that many philosophical problems arise from misunderstanding how words actually work in everyday life, rather than from deep metaphysical mysteries. His ideas influenced not just philosophy but also mathematics, logic, and even how people approach psychology and artificial intelligence today.
    private language argument
    Wittgenstein's argument depending on the assumption that for words to be meaningful, their use must be open to public checking.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A secret as such does not exist; every secret is necessarily shared.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective