Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A secret as such does not exist; every secret is necessar... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    A secret as such does not exist; every secret is necessarily shared.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.To genuinely possess a secret, one must tell it to oneself, forming an internal representation of it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Forming a representation of the secret requires a trace or name, which is in principle shareable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If the secret must necessarily be shareable, it is always already shared.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Wittgenstein's private language argument establishes that internal representations require public criteria, but this does not collapse the distinction between what is shareable in principle and what is actually shared.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A potential for sharing is ontologically distinct from actual sharing: a locked manuscript shared with no one remains unshared despite being written in a public language.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The Derridean slide from 'in principle shareable' to 'always already shared' commits a modal fallacy, confusing possibility with actuality in a way that would also dissolve meaningful distinctions like public/private and disclosure/concealment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kierkegaard's account of Abraham in 'Fear and Trembling' demonstrates an absolute secret grounded not in linguistic structure but in an incommensurable singular relation to the divine that resists all mediation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a secret's content exceeds any available representational or linguistic form—as in ineffable religious experience or qualia—then the premise that forming a representation requires a shareable trace fails to apply universally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Levinas similarly insists that the alterity of the Other is never fully constituted through shared semiotic systems, suggesting interiority can harbor genuine opacity irreducible to the logic of the trace.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A potential for sharing is ontologically distinct from actual sharing: a locked ...Forming a representation of the secret requires a trace or name, which is in pri...If a secret's content exceeds any available representational or linguistic form—...If the secret must necessarily be shareable, it is always already shared.
    +7 moreShow less
    In order to keep the secret (the first negation: 'I will not tell'), one must ne...Kierkegaard's account of Abraham in 'Fear and Trembling' demonstrates an absolut...Levinas similarly insists that the alterity of the Other is never fully constitu...The Derridean slide from 'in principle shareable' to 'always already shared' com...Therefore, in order to keep the secret one must simultaneously break it.To genuinely possess a secret, one must tell it to oneself, forming an internal ...Wittgenstein's private language argument establishes that internal representatio...

    Similar

    If the secret must necessarily be shareable, it is always already shar...89%To possess a secret really, one must tell it to oneself.81%The structure of the secret entails that possessing a secret and not p...81%To genuinely possess a secret, one must tell it to oneself, forming an...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: derrida
    View source passageHide passage
    Now, let us go to another “other place,” which can be found in “How to Avoid Speaking.” Here Derrida discusses negative theology by means of the idea of “dénégation,” “denegation” or “denial.” The French word “dénégation” translates Freud’s term “Verneinung.” Both words’ prefixes imply an emphasis of negation (although the French prefix also implies a negation of a negation). Yet, within psychoanalysis and in particular in Freud, the term ,“Verneinung” implies that when the patient denies a desi
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit