Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations show that recognizing a logical or probabilistic connection between propositions is itself a normative act, not mere direct acquaintance.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
An action that sets or follows a standard or rule about how things should be, as opposed to just describing how things actually are.
propositions(Answer to the question of what metaphysical category propositions belong to)
Entities belonging to a sui generis metaphysical category of their own kind, not reducible to other categories
rule-following considerations(in philosophy of language)
Wittgenstein's famous puzzle about how we know what rule to follow next: if you learn a rule by seeing examples, how do you know you're applying it correctly to new cases you've never seen before?