Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Worries about epiphenomenal irrelevance have been raised ... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The threat of epiphenomenal irrelevance cannot be simply dismissed as an obvious non-option

    Worries about epiphenomenal irrelevance have been raised with regard to qualia and qualitative consciousness by credible philosophers

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & Mind

    Related

    At least some forms of consciousness have been seriously alleged in recent liter...Challenges have also been leveled against the causal status of meta-mental consc...The threat of epiphenomenal irrelevance cannot be simply dismissed as an obvious...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The threat of epiphenomenal irrelevance cannot be simply dismissed as ...76%If epiphenomenalism is true, it is explanatorily redundant to postulat...75%Any adequate answer to the question of what consciousness is must addr...74%If epiphenomenalism is true, one's own mental states do not explain on...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: consciousness
    View source passageHide passage
    Perhaps the most basic issue posed by any version of the Why question is whether or not consciousness of the relevant sort has any causal impact at all. If it has no effects and makes no causal difference whatsoever, then it would seem unable to play any significant role in the systems or organisms in which it is present, thus undercutting at the outset most inquiries about its possible value. Nor can the threat of epiphenomenal irrelevance be simply dismissed as an obvious non-option, since at

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective