Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Writtenness is not a defining feature of constitutionalism — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Writtenness is not a defining feature of constitutionalism

    Democracy & GovernancePhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.H.L.A. Hart's distinction between primary and secondary rules grounds constitutional authority in social practice and recognition, not textual inscription.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A rule of recognition functions as constitutional law when officials treat it as binding, regardless of whether it appears in any written document.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.New Zealand's uncodified constitution, operating through parliamentary statute and convention, exercises genuine supreme normative authority without a single written text.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Lon Fuller's internal morality of law identifies fidelity to principle—not document form—as the criterion distinguishing constitutional governance from arbitrary rule.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Constitutionalism's core function is limiting governmental power through durable, higher-order norms, a function conventions and common law can perform as effectively as written charters.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The United Kingdom has a constitution that has historically taken largely unwritten form
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The UK constitution demonstrates that constitutions can exist without a single written document resembling the American Constitution
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageDemocracy & Governance

    Related

    A rule of recognition functions as constitutional law when officials treat it as...Constitutionalism's core function is limiting governmental power through durable...H.L.A. Hart's distinction between primary and secondary rules grounds constituti...Lon Fuller's internal morality of law identifies fidelity to principle—not docum...
    +3 moreShow less
    New Zealand's uncodified constitution, operating through parliamentary statute a...The UK constitution demonstrates that constitutions can exist without a single w...The United Kingdom has a constitution that has historically taken largely unwrit...

    Similar

    Such universal principles are indifferent regarding the specific form ...73%Genuine originalism is typically understood to be constrained by the o...73%Reason by itself cannot determine the specific form of a constitution.72%The UK constitution demonstrates that constitutions can exist without ...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: constitutionalism
    View source passageHide passage
    Some scholars believe that constitutional norms do not exist unless they are in some way enshrined in a written document (e.g., Rubenfeld 1998). But most accept that constitutions (or elements of them) can be unwritten, and cite, as an obvious example of this possibility, the constitution of the United Kingdom. One must be careful here, however. Though the UK has nothing resembling the American Constitution and its Bill of Rights, it nevertheless contains a number of written instruments which ha
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit