Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Arthur Prior — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Arthur Prior
    Arthur Prior

    Arthur Prior

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Temporal Logic

    1914 – 1969

    Arthur Norman Prior (1914–1969) was a New Zealand logician and philosopher who founded tense logic, the formal study of temporal operators in modal systems. Working at Manchester and Oxford, he developed a rigorous framework for reasoning about past, present, and future that transformed both philosophical logic and the metaphysics of time. His propositional logic work, including quantification over propositions, remains foundational to debates on modality and ontology.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Founded tense logic (temporal logic), introducing operators P, F, H, and G for past and future quantification

    2

    Developed the Priorian view of propositions as world-bound, influencing debates on actualism and possibilism

    3

    Authored Past, Present and Future (1967), the seminal systematic treatment of temporal logic

    4

    Advanced propositional quantification and its implications for ontology of abstract objects

    5

    Influenced modal logic, philosophy of time, and computer science formal verification methods

    Positions & Arguments(4)

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The lack of informativeness is not a good objection to the optimalist account of negative truths

    claim

    The truth of a proposition in a world does not entail that the proposition exists in that world

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    claim

    The truth of a proposition in a world does not entail that the proposition exists in that world

    claim

    No-trace actualists cannot provide a standard compositional semantics for modal languages.

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    4

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Temporal Logic

    Topic Influence

    Modality & Possibility3
    Truth & Knowledge2
    Free Will & Foreknowledge1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis3 sharedImmanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedPlato3 sharedRudolf Carnap3 sharedIsaac Newton3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Modality & Possibility→See Truth & Knowledge→
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
    3 shared