Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Ariel Rubinstein — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Ariel Rubinstein
    Ariel Rubinstein

    Ariel Rubinstein

    contemporaryGame Theory / Mathematical Economics

    b. 1951

    Ariel Rubinstein is an Israeli economist and game theorist known for his influential work on bargaining theory, bounded rationality, and the foundations of game theory. He has made significant contributions to the analysis of strategic behavior under cognitive constraints and has been a persistent critic of the direct application of formal economic models to real-world policy.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the Rubinstein bargaining model of alternating offers

    2

    Pioneered formal analysis of bounded rationality in economic theory

    3

    Co-authored 'A Course in Game Theory' with Martin Osborne, a foundational textbook

    4

    Advanced the critique that economic models are fables, not direct policy tools

    5

    Contributed to the epistemic foundations of game theory and common knowledge

    Positions & Arguments

    (2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Game Theory / Mathematical Economics

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→