Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Camerer — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Camerer
    C

    Camerer

    contemporaryBehavioral Economics / Behavioral Game Theory

    b. 1959

    Colin F. Camerer is an American behavioral economist and neuroeconomist at the California Institute of Technology. He is a pioneering figure in applying psychological insights to game theory and economic decision-making, demonstrating through extensive experimental work that human strategic reasoning systematically departs from classical rationality assumptions.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed behavioral game theory as a unified framework integrating cognition, learning, and bounded rationality into strategic interaction models

    2

    Authored 'Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction' (2003), a landmark synthesis of the field

    3

    Pioneered neuroeconomics research combining brain imaging with economic decision-making tasks

    4

    Demonstrated systematic violations of backward induction and Nash equilibrium predictions in experimental settings

    5

    Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and awarded a MacArthur Fellowship

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    Backward induction is self-undermining as a solution concept in certain extensive-form games

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Behavioral Economics / Behavioral Game Theory

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→