Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Cleanthes — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Cleanthes
    Cleanthes

    Cleanthes

    modernEmpirical Theism / Natural Religion

    Cleanthes is a fictional interlocutor in David Hume's posthumously published Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), representing the position of empirical theism. He defends the design argument for God's existence through experiential analogy, contending that the universe's order and complexity resemble the products of human intelligence and design. As the dialogue's advocate for natural religion, he consistently privileges probable empirical reasoning over purely a priori or demonstrative proofs.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Defends the analogical teleological argument: the universe resembles a machine, therefore probably has an intelligent designer

    2

    Argues that demonstrative a priori reasoning cannot establish conclusions about matters of fact or existence

    3

    Represents the epistemological middle position between Demea's rationalist dogmatism and Philo's radical skepticism

    4

    Articulates the view that religious belief must rest on probabilistic empirical inference rather than logical necessity

    5

    Serves as Hume's vehicle for examining the strongest available case for natural religion

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Demonstrative reasoning cannot bridge the gap between past observations and conclusions about future regularities in nature

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Demonstrative reasoning cannot bridge the gap between past observations and conclusions about future regularities in nature

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    modern

    Tradition

    Empirical Theism / Natural Religion

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→