Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Daniel Jacobson — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Daniel Jacobson
    DJ

    Daniel Jacobson

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Moral Sentimentalism

    Daniel Jacobson is a contemporary analytic philosopher at the University of Michigan known for his work in metaethics, moral psychology, and aesthetics. He has contributed significantly to fitting-attitude theories of value and sentimentalist accounts of moral wrongness. His work explores how reactive attitudes like resentment and indignation ground moral concepts, and he has written influentially on the intersection of ethics and aesthetics.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a fitting-attitude account of wrongness grounded in reactive emotions like resentment

    2

    Contributed to debates on moral sentimentalism and the role of emotions in ethical judgment

    3

    Written influential work on the relationship between ethics and aesthetics, including debates over moralism

    4

    Critiqued Kantian and rationalist ethics from a sentimentalist perspective

    5

    Engaged seriously with free speech, pornography, and expressive harm in political philosophy

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Moral Sentimentalism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 shared
    David Lewis
    2 shared
    Aristotle2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Bas van Fraassen2 shared
    Patrick Maher2 shared
    Plato2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Moral Responsibility→