Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Demea — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Demea
    D

    Demea

    modernRationalist Theology (fictional character in Humean dialogue)

    Demea is a fictional interlocutor in David Hume's posthumously published Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), representing orthodox theological rationalism. He defends a priori arguments for God's existence—particularly a version of the cosmological argument—while insisting on the absolute incomprehensibility of the divine nature. As a dramatic character, he serves as a foil to the empirical theist Cleanthes and the skeptic Philo, articulating a position close to Calvinist or Cartesian rationalist theology.

    SEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Defends a priori cosmological argument for a necessarily existing first cause

    2

    Argues that God's nature is wholly incomprehensible and beyond human rational inquiry

    3

    Represents orthodox theistic rationalism as a dialectical position within Hume's critique of natural religion

    4

    Advances the claim that demonstrative reasoning is insufficient to ground empirical and causal conclusions

    Positions & Arguments

    (1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Demonstrative reasoning cannot bridge the gap between past observations and conclusions about future regularities in nature

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Demonstrative reasoning cannot bridge the gap between past observations and conclusions about future regularities in nature

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    modern

    Tradition

    Rationalist Theology (fictional character in Humean dialogue)

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→