Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Fagin — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Fagin
    Fagin

    Fagin

    contemporaryMathematical Logic, Epistemic Logic, Theoretical Computer Science

    b. 1945

    Ronald Fagin is an American logician and computer scientist at IBM Research known for foundational contributions to finite model theory, database theory, and epistemic logic. His work bridges mathematical logic and computation, most notably through the co-authorship of 'Reasoning About Knowledge,' which established formal frameworks for analyzing knowledge, belief, and plausibility in multi-agent systems. His results connecting descriptive complexity to computational complexity classes remain central to theoretical computer science.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Co-authored 'Reasoning About Knowledge' (1995), a foundational text in epistemic and doxastic logic

    2

    Proved Fagin's theorem: NP equals the class of problems expressible in existential second-order logic

    3

    Developed Fourth Normal Form (4NF) for relational database design

    4

    Contributed to the formal study of plausibility and belief revision in game-theoretic settings

    5

    Pioneered descriptive complexity theory linking logical expressibility to computational complexity

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Mathematical Logic, Epistemic Logic, Theoretical Computer Science

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→