Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Fagin, Halpern et al. — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Fagin, Halpern et al.
    FH

    Fagin, Halpern et al.

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy / Epistemic Logic

    Ronald Fagin, Joseph Halpern, and collaborators are contemporary computer scientists and logicians whose joint work formalized reasoning about knowledge, belief, and uncertainty in multi-agent systems. Their foundational text 'Reasoning About Knowledge' established epistemic logic as a rigorous tool for distributed computing, game theory, and AI, including analyses of plausibility measures and belief revision in sequential games.

    SEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Co-authored 'Reasoning About Knowledge' (1995), a foundational text on epistemic logic in multi-agent systems

    2

    Developed formal models of common knowledge and distributed knowledge for computer science applications

    3

    Advanced the theory of plausibility measures as generalizations of probability for belief representation

    4

    Applied epistemic logic to sequential games, distinguishing ex ante from in-play plausibility updates

    5

    Bridged logic, game theory, and theoretical computer science through rigorous formal frameworks

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy / Epistemic Logic

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→