Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Gideon Rosen — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Gideon Rosen
    GR

    Gideon Rosen

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    Gideon Rosen is a contemporary analytic philosopher at Princeton University, where he is the Stuart Professor of Philosophy. He works primarily in metaphysics, metaethics, and philosophy of mathematics, with influential contributions to the theory of moral responsibility, mathematical nominalism, and the metaphysics of grounding and essence.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a widely discussed account of moral blameworthiness and the conditions under which agents are responsible for wrongdoing

    2

    Contributed to mathematical fictionalism and nominalism, arguing that mathematical objects need not be taken as real

    3

    Advanced work on metaphysical grounding, essence, and the structure of explanatory priority

    4

    Explored modal epistemology and the limits of conceivability as a guide to possibility

    5

    Applied metaethical analysis to moral obligation, normative explanation, and the nature of wrongness

    Positions & Arguments(3)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    Both the existence monist and existence nihilist must establish that the premises of the exclusion argument (or any alternative they provide) have sufficient plausibility to override considerations from intuition and perception.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Both the existence monist and existence nihilist must establish that the premises of the exclusion argument (or any alternative they provide) have sufficient plausibility to override considerations from intuition and perception.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge3
    Consequentialism1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    claim

    The lack of informativeness is not a good objection to the optimalist account of negative truths

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    Consequentialism

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    Brian Skyrms3 shared
    Plato3 shared
    René Descartes3 shared
    Allan Gibbard3 shared
    Socrates3 shared
    David Copp3 shared
    David Lewis2 shared
    Immanuel Kant2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consequentialism→