Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Gilbert Harman — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Gilbert Harman
    GH

    Gilbert Harman

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    1938 – 2021

    Gilbert Harman (1938-2021) was an American philosopher who spent his career at Princeton University, making influential contributions to epistemology, philosophy of mind, moral philosophy, and philosophy of language. He is best known for developing and naming the concept of 'inference to the best explanation' and for his skepticism about character traits in moral psychology.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Coined and developed 'inference to the best explanation' as a mode of reasoning

    2

    Authored the influential 1973 book 'Thought' on epistemology and philosophy of mind

    3

    Advanced moral relativism and challenged the existence of robust character traits

    4

    Contributed to the Quinean tradition on meaning, logic, and reasoning

    5

    Long-time Princeton professor who trained generations of analytic philosophers

    Positions & Arguments

    (5)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Xunzi's criticism of Mencius has force when Mencius is interpreted via the water-metaphor view

    Virtue Ethics

    claim

    Xunzi's criticism of Mencius has force when Mencius is interpreted via the water-metaphor view

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    Any theory that explains 'good' as an optative in unasserted contexts would render obviously valid arguments invalid by treating them as equivocal

    Skepticism

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    claim

    Boyd's abductive argument for scientific methodology's reliability still stands

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    claim

    Boyd's abductive argument for scientific methodology's reliability still stands

    claim

    A priori justification is similar to, but significantly different from, a posteriori justification

    Perception

    claim

    A priori justification is similar to, but significantly different from, a posteriori justification

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    5

    Topics

    6

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge3
    Skepticism2
    Virtue Ethics1
    Perception1
    Philosophy of Language1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Aristotle6 sharedImmanuel Kant5 sharedDavid Hume5 sharedPlato5 sharedRené Descartes5 sharedThomas Hobbes5 sharedIsaac Newton5 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→
    John Locke5 shared