Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    J.M.E. McTaggart — Carmelics
    Thinkers/J.M.E. McTaggart
    JM

    J.M.E. McTaggart

    modernBritish Idealism

    1866 – 1925

    John McTaggart Ellis McTaggart (1866–1925) was a British idealist philosopher at Trinity College, Cambridge, best known for his argument for the unreality of time and his systematic personal idealism. His metaphysics held that reality consists entirely of minds and their perceptions, developing a unique atheistic idealism influenced by but departing significantly from Hegel.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Formulated the A-series/B-series distinction in the philosophy of time in 'The Unreality of Time' (1908)

    2

    Developed a comprehensive idealist metaphysical system in 'The Nature of Existence' (1921–1927)

    3

    Advanced a distinctive atheistic personal idealism arguing reality consists solely of selves and their perceptions

    4

    Provided influential early commentary on Hegel's dialectical method in 'Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic' (1896)

    Positions & Arguments

    (3)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    claim

    The contradiction between the self and the not-self can be resolved rather than forcing us to reject both sides and start over.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    claim

    The contradiction between the self and the not-self can be resolved rather than forcing us to reject both sides and start over.

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    Natural Theology

    claim

    We can rationally believe both ourselves and God to be mental in nature from a practical point of view.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    3

    Era

    modern

    Tradition

    British Idealism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge3
    Modality & Possibility2
    Natural Theology1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedBertrand Russell3 sharedPlato3 sharedRené Descartes3 sharedRudolf Carnap3 sharedDavid Hilbert3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Modality & Possibility→