Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Jonathan Schaffer — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Jonathan Schaffer
    JS

    Jonathan Schaffer

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    b. 1970

    Jonathan Schaffer is a contemporary analytic philosopher and Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University, specializing in metaphysics and epistemology. He is best known for defending priority monism—the view that the cosmos is the one fundamental entity and all else is grounded in it. His work on grounding, fundamentality, and contrastivism has been highly influential in shaping contemporary debates in analytic metaphysics.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Defended priority monism, arguing the whole cosmos is ontologically prior to its parts

    2

    Developed a systematic theory of grounding and ontological dependence

    3

    Introduced contrastivism in epistemology, analyzing knowledge as a three-place relation

    4

    Contributed to the metaphysics of causation via contrastive causal claims

    5

    Authored the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on monism

    Positions & Arguments

    (2)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    Both the existence monist and existence nihilist must establish that the premises of the exclusion argument (or any alternative they provide) have sufficient plausibility to override considerations from intuition and perception.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Both the existence monist and existence nihilist must establish that the premises of the exclusion argument (or any alternative they provide) have sufficient plausibility to override considerations from intuition and perception.

    claim

    The lack of informativeness is not a good objection to the optimalist account of negative truths

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedAristotle2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedStathis Psillos2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Modality & Possibility→