Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Joseph Halpern — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Joseph Halpern
    Joseph Halpern

    Joseph Halpern

    contemporaryFormal Epistemology, Logic in Computer Science

    b. 1953

    Joseph Halpern is a computer scientist and logician at Cornell University whose work bridges formal epistemology, artificial intelligence, and game theory. He is best known for foundational contributions to the logic of knowledge and belief, probabilistic reasoning, and the formal analysis of causality. His research has shaped how both philosophers and computer scientists model what agents know, how they update beliefs, and how causal responsibility is assigned.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Co-developed the possible-worlds framework for reasoning about distributed knowledge (with Fagin, Moses, and Vardi), foundational to epistemic logic in CS

    2

    Developed the Halpern-Pearl structural causal model of actual causation, widely adopted in philosophy and AI

    3

    Co-authored 'Reasoning About Knowledge' (1995), the standard reference on epistemic logic for computer scientists

    4

    Contributed formal analyses of plausibility measures and conditional probability for belief revision and game theory

    5

    Demonstrated limits on agents' logical omniscience, challenging the a priori status of logical knowledge in resource-bounded settings

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Formal Epistemology, Logic in Computer Science

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→