Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Justin D'Arms — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Justin D'Arms
    JD

    Justin D'Arms

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Metaethics, Sentimentalism

    Justin D'Arms is a contemporary American philosopher at Ohio State University specializing in metaethics and the philosophy of emotion. He is best known for defending sentimentalism — the view that moral and evaluative concepts are to be understood in terms of the fittingness of emotional responses. His collaborative work with Daniel Jacobson on the 'resonance' model of emotional evaluation has been influential in debates about the relationship between affect and ethical judgment.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a fitting-attitude sentimentalist account linking moral wrongness to the fittingness of reactive emotions such as resentment

    2

    Co-authored influential work with Daniel Jacobson distinguishing moral from merely prudential criticism of emotions

    3

    Advanced the 'resonance' model of emotional evaluation in metaethics

    4

    Contributed to debates on the autonomy of ethics from evolutionary debunking arguments

    5

    Applied sentimentalist frameworks to humor, shame, and other non-moral evaluative domains

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Metaethics, Sentimentalism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 shared
    David Lewis
    2 shared
    Aristotle2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Bas van Fraassen2 shared
    Patrick Maher2 shared
    Plato2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Moral Responsibility→