Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Perea — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Perea
    P

    Perea

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy / Epistemic Game Theory

    Perea is a contemporary game theorist and epistemic logician known for work on interactive epistemology and rationality in dynamic games. His research focuses on how players reason about each other's beliefs and plausibility orderings during sequential play, contributing to the foundations of epistemic game theory.

    SEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed frameworks for epistemic analysis of dynamic games

    2

    Authored work on common belief in rationality and backward induction

    3

    Contributed to the theory of plausibility updates in sequential games

    4

    Advanced the interpretation of rationality in extensive-form games

    Positions & Arguments

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy / Epistemic Game Theory

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 shared
    (1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Immanuel Kant
    2 shared
    Boyd2 shared
    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Stathis Psillos2 shared
    Bertrand Russell2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Aristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→