Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Richard Whately — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Richard Whately
    RW

    Richard Whately

    modernBritish Empiricism / Anglican Theology

    1787 – 1863

    Richard Whately (1787–1863) was an English logician, rhetorician, and Anglican Archbishop of Dublin who played a central role in reviving formal logic in nineteenth-century Britain. His Elements of Logic (1826) reintroduced Aristotelian syllogistic to English-speaking audiences and shaped the teaching of logic for decades. He also made notable contributions to rhetoric, political economy, and the epistemology of testimony and probabilistic reasoning.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Authored Elements of Logic (1826), reviving systematic formal logic in British intellectual life

    2

    Authored Elements of Rhetoric (1828), a foundational text in the theory of argumentation

    3

    Published Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Buonaparte (1819), satirizing radical historical skepticism

    4

    Served as Archbishop of Dublin (1831–1863), influencing Irish educational reform

    5

    Contributed to the epistemology of testimony and probabilistic evidence in theological and philosophical contexts

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Natural Theology

    claim

    The objection that probabilistic arguments are only of interest when founded on all relevant available evidence is not a legitimate objection against confirmatory probabilistic arguments

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    modern

    Tradition

    British Empiricism / Anglican Theology

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1
    Natural Theology1

    Related Thinkers

    David Hume3 sharedImmanuel Kant3 sharedPlato3 sharedAristotle3 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz3 sharedRudolf Carnap3 sharedThomas Aquinas3 sharedChristian Garve3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→