Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Roger Crisp — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Roger Crisp
    RC

    Roger Crisp

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    b. 1961

    Roger Crisp is a British moral philosopher and Professor of Moral Philosophy at St Anne's College, Oxford. He has made significant contributions to normative ethics, metaethics, and the history of moral philosophy, with particular focus on well-being, reasons, and virtue ethics. His work engages both contemporary analytic ethics and the classical tradition, including major scholarship on Aristotle and Henry Sidgwick.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed influential hedonist and fitting-attitude accounts of well-being in Reasons and the Good (2006)

    2

    Produced a widely used translation and edition of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics for Cambridge University Press

    3

    Contributed to fitting attitude theories, arguing moral concepts like wrongness can be analyzed via appropriate emotional responses such as resentment

    4

    Authored The Cosmos of Duty, a major study of Sidgwick's Methods of Ethics

    5

    Edited key anthologies in virtue ethics and contributed to the revival of classical ethical theory in analytic philosophy

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 sharedDavid Lewis2 sharedAristotle2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedBas van Fraassen2 sharedPatrick Maher2 sharedPlato2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Moral Responsibility→