Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Roger Scruton — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Roger Scruton
    Roger Scruton

    Roger Scruton

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Conservative Political Philosophy

    1944 – 2020

    Roger Scruton (1944–2020) was a British philosopher, writer, and public intellectual best known for his defense of conservatism and his work in aesthetics, political philosophy, and the philosophy of culture. He authored over fifty books spanning topics from Kant and Hegel to music, architecture, sexual ethics, and the nature of beauty. A prolific controversialist, he argued for the importance of tradition, institution, and the sacred in sustaining human communities.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a systematic conservative political philosophy grounded in tradition, authority, and civil association

    2

    Produced major works in aesthetics including 'The Aesthetics of Music' and 'Beauty'

    3

    Authored 'The Meaning of Conservatism' (1980), a landmark text in Anglophone conservative thought

    4

    Contributed to moral philosophy through work on reactive attitudes, resentment, and fittingness

    5

    Founded 'The Salisbury Review' and was a prominent public defender of Western cultural heritage

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Conservative Political Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 sharedDavid Lewis2 sharedAristotle2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedBas van Fraassen2 sharedPatrick Maher2 sharedPlato2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Moral Responsibility→