Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Ronald Fagin — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Ronald Fagin
    Ronald Fagin

    Ronald Fagin

    contemporaryMathematical Logic / Formal Epistemology

    b. 1945

    Ronald Fagin is an American mathematician and computer scientist at IBM Research, renowned for foundational contributions to finite model theory, database theory, and the logic of knowledge. His work bridges mathematical logic and computer science, most notably through Fagin's theorem characterizing NP in terms of existential second-order logic and his influential research on epistemic reasoning.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Proved Fagin's theorem, characterizing NP as existential second-order logic

    2

    Co-authored 'Reasoning About Knowledge', a foundational text on epistemic logic

    3

    Pioneered formal frameworks for data exchange and schema mappings

    4

    Made foundational contributions to finite model theory and its applications

    5

    Developed influential models of knowledge and belief in multi-agent systems

    Positions & Arguments

    (2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    claim

    There is a fundamental tension between treating logical knowledge as a priori and the computational intractability of deciding logical validity.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Mathematical Logic / Formal Epistemology

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→