Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Samuelson — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Samuelson
    S

    Samuelson

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Game Theory, Epistemic Game Theory

    b. 1955

    Larry Samuelson is a contemporary game theorist and economist at Yale University whose work focuses on the epistemic and evolutionary foundations of strategic rationality. He has made significant contributions to understanding how beliefs, learning, and plausibility structures shape outcomes in dynamic and sequential games. His research bridges formal decision theory, epistemic game theory, and evolutionary models of behavior.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed foundational work on epistemic conditions for rationality in sequential games

    2

    Contributed to resolving debates between Aumann-style and Stalnaker-style models of common belief and rationality

    3

    Co-authored influential research on evolutionary game theory and long-run equilibrium selection

    4

    Advanced the formal analysis of plausibility orderings and belief revision in extensive-form games

    5

    Authored the widely used graduate text Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection (1997)

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Skepticism

    claim

    The difference in conclusions between Aumann (1995) and Stalnaker (1998) is due to differing models of belief revision upon deviation from the backward induction path

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The difference in conclusions between Aumann (1995) and Stalnaker (1998) is due to differing models of belief revision upon deviation from the backward induction path

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Game Theory, Epistemic Game Theory

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→