Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Thomas Uebel — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Thomas Uebel
    TU

    Thomas Uebel

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy of Science, History of Logical Empiricism

    Thomas Uebel is a contemporary philosopher of science at the University of Manchester specializing in the history and philosophy of logical empiricism, particularly the internal debates of the Vienna Circle. He has produced landmark scholarship on Otto Neurath and the epistemological controversies surrounding the protocol sentence debate. His work critically reassesses the legacy of logical positivism, distinguishing its more defensible empiricist commitments from the doctrines that led to its decline.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Produced definitive scholarly analysis of Otto Neurath's role and philosophy within the Vienna Circle

    2

    Reconstructed the protocol sentence debate and its significance for empiricist epistemology

    3

    Distinguished defensible forms of logical empiricism from the doctrines that rendered it vulnerable to Quinean and Kuhnian critiques

    4

    Authored 'Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within', a major study of Neurath's anti-foundationalist empiricism

    5

    Advanced nuanced accounts of epistemic reduction and the meaning of 'meaning' in radical empiricism

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    We must distinguish between the radical empiricist's meaning of 'meaning' (epistemic reduction) and a more common-sensical meaning of 'meaning' (factual reference).

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    We must distinguish between the radical empiricist's meaning of 'meaning' (epistemic reduction) and a more common-sensical meaning of 'meaning' (factual reference).

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy of Science, History of Logical Empiricism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Philosophy of Language1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 shared
    David Lewis
    2 shared
    Bertrand Russell2 shared
    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Stathis Psillos2 shared
    Aristotle2 shared
    Bas van Fraassen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Philosophy of Language→