A collective attribution representing various contemporary philosophers and normative game theorists who have critiqued classical rationality assumptions in extensive-form games. This body of work examines whether standard solution concepts like backward induction are coherent under their own assumptions about rational play.
Identified the self-undermining nature of backward induction in finite extensive-form games
Challenged common knowledge of rationality assumptions in sequential games
Advanced epistemic game theory by analyzing what players can rationally believe at off-equilibrium nodes
Contributed to debates on the relationship between rationality and predictability in strategic interaction