Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    van Benthem — Carmelics
    Thinkers/van Benthem
    van Benthem

    van Benthem

    contemporaryFormal Logic, Dynamic Epistemic Logic

    b. 1949

    Johan van Benthem (born 1949) is a Dutch logician and philosopher at the University of Amsterdam and Stanford University, widely regarded as a founder of dynamic epistemic logic. His work unifies logic, game theory, and information theory, examining how knowledge and belief evolve through action and communication. He has fundamentally shaped the study of modal logic, arrow logic, and the logical foundations of rational agency.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Co-founded dynamic epistemic logic (DEL), a framework for reasoning about knowledge change through communication and action

    2

    Developed game logic and the logical analysis of strategic rationality in sequential and concurrent games

    3

    Pioneered arrow logic and the algebraic semantics of relational reasoning

    4

    Authored foundational texts including Logic in Games and Modal Logic for Open Minds

    5

    Bridged formal logic with cognitive science, linguistics, and computer science through the logic of information flow

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Formal Logic, Dynamic Epistemic Logic

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→