Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    van Benthem & Pacuit — Carmelics
    Thinkers/van Benthem & Pacuit
    van Benthem & Pacuit

    van Benthem & Pacuit

    contemporaryDynamic Epistemic Logic, Formal Epistemology

    Johan van Benthem and Eric Pacuit are logicians who have collaborated extensively on dynamic epistemic logic and its applications to game theory. Van Benthem (b. 1949) is a central figure in modal and dynamic logic at the University of Amsterdam and Stanford University; Pacuit is a philosopher-logician at the University of Maryland specializing in formal epistemology, epistemic game theory, and social choice. Their joint work advances formal models of how rational agents update beliefs and reason strategically under uncertainty.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed formal models of plausibility update and belief revision in sequential games during actual play

    2

    Distinguished epistemic states arising from actual game play versus counterfactual reasoning

    3

    Advanced the application of dynamic epistemic logic to game-theoretic rationality

    4

    Contributed to the modal logic foundations of epistemic game theory

    5

    Bridged formal logic, epistemology, and economic game theory through collaborative research

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Dynamic Epistemic Logic, Formal Epistemology

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→