Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    van der Hoek & Wooldridge — Carmelics
    Thinkers/van der Hoek & Wooldridge
    van der Hoek & Wooldridge

    van der Hoek & Wooldridge

    contemporaryFormal Epistemology / Multi-Agent Systems / Epistemic Game Theory

    Wiebe van der Hoek and Michael Wooldridge are logicians and computer scientists whose collaborative work fuses epistemic logic, game theory, and multi-agent systems. They have made foundational contributions to the formal study of knowledge, belief, and strategic reasoning among computational agents. Their joint research is particularly influential in the formal analysis of rational agency and epistemic game theory.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed formal logical frameworks for reasoning about knowledge and belief in multi-agent systems

    2

    Advanced epistemic game theory by applying modal logic to strategic interaction and belief revision

    3

    Contributed foundational results on the complexity of reasoning in multi-agent epistemic logics

    4

    Co-authored influential work on alternating-time temporal logic (ATL) for strategic reasoning

    5

    Helped establish the field of computational social choice and its logical underpinnings

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Plausibility updates in sequential games during actual play differ in interpretation from plausibility updates used in pregame deliberation for Backward Induction.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Formal Epistemology / Multi-Agent Systems / Epistemic Game Theory

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedBoyd2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→