Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Vanderschraaf — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Vanderschraaf
    V

    Vanderschraaf

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Game Theory

    Peter Vanderschraaf is a contemporary analytic philosopher specializing in game theory, social contract theory, and formal epistemology. He is known for applying formal tools—particularly coordination games and Bayesian rationality—to problems in political philosophy and the foundations of convention. His work bridges Hobbesian contractarianism with modern decision theory.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a game-theoretic account of convention extending David Lewis's framework

    2

    Applied inductive deliberation models to explain how agents reach equilibrium in coordination problems

    3

    Analyzed the epistemic foundations of Hobbesian social contract theory using formal methods

    4

    Contributed to debates on common knowledge, contrasting Aumann's and Stalnaker's models of rationality

    5

    Authored Learning and Coordination: Inductive Deliberation, Equilibria, and Convention (2001)

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Skepticism

    claim

    The difference in conclusions between Aumann (1995) and Stalnaker (1998) is due to differing models of belief revision upon deviation from the backward induction path

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The difference in conclusions between Aumann (1995) and Stalnaker (1998) is due to differing models of belief revision upon deviation from the backward induction path

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Game Theory

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Skepticism1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 shared
    Immanuel Kant
    2 shared
    Boyd2 shared
    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Stathis Psillos2 shared
    Bertrand Russell2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Aristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→