Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A rational God would not permit an act only under conditi... — Carmelics
    Home/Against an attribute of God
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→It would be unreasonable for God to permit sexual acts only in a manner in which they cannot actually be performed

    A rational God would not permit an act only under conditions that make the act impossible to perform

    Against a future action of GodAgainst an attribute of God
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Against an attribute of GodAgainst a future action of God

    Connections

    3 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Against an attribute of God
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Bioethics
    1 linked
    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Human beings are so constructed that sexual intercourse necessarily involves ple...It would be unreasonable for God to permit sexual acts only in a manner in which...Requiring that sexual acts be performed without pleasure is requiring something ...

    Similar

    It would be unreasonable for God to permit sexual acts only in a manne...80%What is impossible is impossible because God does not will it, which i...75%Requiring that sexual acts be performed without pleasure is requiring ...72%For God or Nature to act against itself is absurd71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: abelard
    View source passageHide passage
    We are so constructed that the feeling of pleasure is inevitable in certain situations: sexual intercourse, eating delicious food, and the like. If sexual pleasure in marriage is not sinful, then the pleasure itself, inside or outside of marriage, is not sinful; if it is sinful, then marriage cannot sanctify it—and if the conclusion were drawn that such acts should be performed wholly without pleasure, then Abelard declares they cannot be done at all, and it was unreasonable (of God) to permit t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective