Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    According to Russell, 'X is good' and 'X is bad' are in t... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Russell's emotivism can account for moral contradictions without treating moral statements as truth-apt propositions

    According to Russell, 'X is good' and 'X is bad' are in the optative mood despite their indicative appearances

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linkedModality & Possibility2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Desires can be inconsistent with one another when they are not compossible (cann...Optative expressions express desires or wishes, not descriptions of factsRussell's emotivism can account for moral contradictions without treating moral ...Two optatives that express non-compossible desires contradict each other by pres...

    Similar

    Speakers do not in fact use 'X is good' as if it were in the optative ...87%'X is good' said by one person and 'X is bad' said by another person c...87%Russell's hypothesis that 'X is good' is exclusively in the optative m...85%For Russell, 'Y is good' is in the optative mood, amounting to the exc...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Again, Russell’s brand of emotivism is immune to this objection. According to Russell, “X is good” and “X is bad” are really in the optative mood despite their indicative appearances. As such, they express desires or wishes, and desires and wishes can, in a sense, be inconsistent with one other, namely when they are not (in Russell’s phrase) “compossible”, that is, when they cannot both be realized. “Would that I had all the ice-cream!” said by me and “Would that I had all the ice-cream!” said b

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective