Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Additional premises—such as 'Act A saves many people's li... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is not a deductive inference.

    Additional premises—such as 'Act A saves many people's lives' or 'Act A leads to many people's deaths'—can weaken or strengthen the inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong'.

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Weaken or strengthen (in argument)(as used in logic and reasoning)
    To make an argument less convincing (weaken) or more convincing (strengthen) by adding new information.
    inference(Nyāya epistemology)
    A component of epistemology in Nyāya philosophy; a veritable inference yields knowledge about the world and must have premises that are themselves known
    premises

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in logic and philosophical arguments)
    Starting statements or assumptions that are used to support a conclusion—like the opening claims in an argument that lead to a final point.

    Related

    In a standard deductive inference, additional premises cannot affect the strengt...The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is not a deductive infer...

    Similar

    The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is not grounde...81%The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' shares key fea...80%The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is criterial e...79%Every truth has a sufficient reason (the Principle of Sufficient Reaso...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    for A might be right even so, when all ethically relevant factors are taken into account. If A helps to save innocent people’s lives, for example, it’s right—actually right, as Ross says—even though it’s a lie. Nor is the relation between (L) and (W) causal or inductive. Lying doesn’t cause wrongness, and although it might be that most (or even all) lies are all-things-considered wrong—actually wrong—it might be that most (or even all) lies aren’t all-things-considered wrong—actually wrong. Rega

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective