Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aesthetic and teleological judgment together offer a solu... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Aesthetic and teleological judgment together offer a solution to the problem of how free moral choice can be efficacious within the phenomenal world.

    AestheticsFree Will & Foreknowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The first two Critiques leave unsolved the problem of how free moral choice in the noumenal realm can produce real effects in the phenomenal world.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A third Critique linking aesthetic and teleological judgment is apparently structured to address this unsolved problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aesthetic and teleological forms of human experience and judgment together somehow bridge the gap between the noumenal and phenomenal realms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's regulative use of teleological judgment in the third Critique explicitly prohibits constitutive claims about noumenal causality in the phenomenal world.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A merely regulative principle cannot do the metaphysical bridging work required to make free moral choice causally efficacious in nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Schopenhauer and later Strawson argue that Kant conflates epistemic and ontological bridging, leaving the causal gap structurally unresolved.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Aesthetic judgment in the Critique of Judgment is grounded in subjective universality and pleasure, not in any causal relation between noumenal freedom and phenomenal events.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Hegel's critique in the Phenomenology identifies Kant's appeal to aesthetic and teleological judgment as a retreat into subjective formalism that cannot ground objective moral efficacy in history.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    AestheticsFree Will & Foreknowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    A merely regulative principle cannot do the metaphysical bridging work required ...A third Critique linking aesthetic and teleological judgment is apparently struc...Aesthetic and teleological forms of human experience and judgment together someh...Aesthetic judgment in the Critique of Judgment is grounded in subjective univers...
    +4 moreShow less
    Hegel's critique in the Phenomenology identifies Kant's appeal to aesthetic and ...Kant's regulative use of teleological judgment in the third Critique explicitly ...Schopenhauer and later Strawson argue that Kant conflates epistemic and ontologi...The first two Critiques leave unsolved the problem of how free moral choice in t...

    Similar

    Aesthetic and teleological experience provide sensuous confirmation of...81%The third Critique shows how aesthetic and teleological experience con...80%The first two Critiques leave unsolved the problem of how free moral c...78%Aesthetic and teleological forms of human experience and judgment toge...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    The problem that has apparently not been solved by the earlier two critiques is that of showing that our choice to act in accordance with the moral law, as the fundamental principle of all laws of freedom, a choice that can be free only if it is conceived of as taking place in a “supersensible” or noumenal realm that is not governed by the deterministic laws of “sensible” or phenomenal nature, where every event is fully determined by chains of causality extending far back beyond any particular c
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit