Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Alcmaeon likely assigned continual motion but not self-motion to the soul
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aetius preserves independent doxographical traditions not solely derived from Aristotle, as Mansfeld and Runia's Aëtiana demonstrates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If Aetius draws on pre-Aristotelian sources, his attribution of self-motion to Alcmaeon cannot be dismissed as mere Aristotelian paraphrase.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Alcmaeon's analogy between soul and heavenly bodies—which he explicitly calls self-moving—suggests self-motion is intrinsic to his cosmological framework.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An analogy functions philosophically by asserting shared properties, so denying self-motion to the soul undermines the explanatory force Alcmaeon intended.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aristotle does not assign self-motion to Alcmaeon
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The doxographical report in Aetius is a paraphrase of Aristotle with self-motion added
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Self-motion attested for Plato and Xenocrates was projected back onto Pythagoras and Thales, who likely did not hold that view
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Show 1 more premise
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42