Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aquinas holds that justice renders to each their due (suu... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If people are tortured forever in Hell with utmost intensity, either they must have committed infinitely evil crimes, or their ECT torturing must be inconsistent with the justice of God

    Aquinas holds that justice renders to each their due (suum cuique), and that disproportionate punishment is an injustice even when inflicted by legitimate authority (ST II-II, Q.61).

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Legitimate authority derives moral force from serving the common good, which requires proportionate punishment to maintain public trust and order.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Disproportionate punishment violates the dignity of the person punished by treating them as less than human, contradicting natural law.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Justice as a virtue requires the agent to act rightly; excessive punishment corrupts the authority figure's character regardless of legitimacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Determining what is 'due' requires substantive value judgments that vary across cultures; no universal standard of proportionality exists objectively.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Legitimate authority may sometimes need flexibility to impose severe penalties for serious crimes or emergencies; strict proportionality can be counterproductive.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aquinas's framework assumes a fixed natural law, but modern justice systems treat proportionality as a procedural constraint, not a metaphysical principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Aquinas
    Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
    Justice(Utilitarian account of justice; contrasted with non-utility-based theories)
    A name for certain classes of moral rules which concern the essentials of human well-being more nearly than other rules for the guidance of life, carrying more absolute obligation.
    ST II-II, Q.61(as a reference indicating where in Aquinas's writings this idea appears)
    A citation system for Aquinas's major work called the 'Summa Theologiae' (Summary of Theology)—this notation points to a specific section and question number where he discusses this topic.
    disproportionate punishment(as the type of injustice Aquinas is concerned with)
    A penalty or consequence that is too severe compared to the wrongdoing—for example, getting expelled from school for being late to class.
    legitimate authority(Normative theory of authority)
    A kind of entity capable of fulfilling a mediating role in practical reasoning, whose directives replace certain first-order reasons for action.
    suum cuique(as Aquinas's definition of justice)
    A Latin phrase meaning 'to each their own' or 'giving each person their due'—the idea that fairness means giving people what they deserve or are entitled to.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Eternal Conscious Torment1 linkedAgainst an aspect of God1 linked

    Related

    Aquinas's framework assumes a fixed natural law, but modern justice systems trea...Determining what is 'due' requires substantive value judgments that vary across ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Disproportionate punishment violates the dignity of the person punished by treat...
    If people are tortured forever in Hell with utmost intensity, either they must h...
    +3 moreShow less
    Justice as a virtue requires the agent to act rightly; excessive punishment corr...Legitimate authority derives moral force from serving the common good, which req...Legitimate authority may sometimes need flexibility to impose severe penalties f...