Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Arbitrary signs have nothing in common by nature with the... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Poetry and rhetoric belong to the beautiful sciences (belles lettres) rather than the fine arts.

    Arbitrary signs have nothing in common by nature with the designated subject matter but are assumed as signs by convention.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics3 linked

    Related

    Poetry and rhetoric belong to the beautiful sciences (belles lettres) rather tha...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Poetry and rhetoric convey their content by artificial (arbitrary/conventional) ...
    The fine arts employ natural signs; the beautiful sciences employ arbitrary or c...

    Similar

    Artificial signs are not constrained in their content by the natural p...85%Arbitrary signs acquire meaning through convention and can therefore b...85%Where signs can be codified, there is more room for precision in inter...83%Arbitrary signs can be associated with any conceivable content82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    Mendelssohn concludes the essay on the “Main Principles of the Fine Arts and Sciences” with a brief but pregnant division of the arts. The basis of his division is a distinction between “natural” and “arbitrary” signs, which has precedents in Du Bos, in Leibniz and Wolff, and beyond all of them in St. Augustine. Signs are natural “if the combination of the subject matter signified is grounded in the very properties of what is designated,” as smoke is a natural product of fire or “The passions ar

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective