Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Aristotelian demonstration requires a definition that del... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Knowing that the First Cause exists does not constitute adequate knowledge of the First Cause for use in Aristotelian demonstration.

    Aristotelian demonstration requires a definition that delimits the possible effects of the subject.

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Natural Theology3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Divine Attributes
    2 linked

    Related

    Knowing that the First Cause exists does not constitute adequate knowledge of th...Such a definition of the First Cause would require knowing it through its causes...The First Cause has no causes through which it could be known.

    Similar

    Convertibility aligns with the scientific task of demonstrating per se...79%The necessity required for demonstration applies to all things under t...79%A principle of demonstration must be necessary, not merely true.76%A demonstration (sullogismos) is a strong form of argument in which co...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: boethius-dacia
    View source passageHide passage
    As a matter of fact, faith is not science (knowledge)—fides non est scientia (De aetern., 366)—and no comprehensive science of the divine is possible. Metaphysics might be a candidate, for all sciences are subordinated to metaphysics, and qua metaphysician a philosopher will know that there is a First Cause (like all of his contemporaries, Boethius held that causal chains cannot be infinite). However, knowing that there is a First Cause does not imply knowing it to a degree that one can capture

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective